Bill Gates Snaps After Trump Halts Funding To World Health Organization

OPINION | This article contains commentary which reflects the author's opinion.

OPINION | This article contains commentary that reflects the author's opinion.

🚨 POLL: Do you support Trump cutting funding to WHO?

[mo-optin-form id=”eTeQvgsXSI”]

🚨 POLL: Do you support Trump cutting funding to WHO?


💥 Click To Text Your Answer 👇


Bill Gates took to Twitter to share his disdain for Trump’s decision to halt funding for the World Health Organization

“Halting funding for the World Health Organization during a world health crisis is as dangerous as it sounds. Their work is slowing the spread of COVID-19 and if that work is stopped no other organization can replace them. The world needs @WHO now more than ever,” he said on Twitter.

WHO tweeted, “Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China.”

Reportedly, WHO has been accused of spreading Chinese Communist Party propaganda, and helping to downplay the severity of the pandemic.

Breitbart reported, “A report by Australia’s Sky News revealed that on January 30, WHO bureaucrats met with a group of doctors and medical experts to discuss a response to the coronavirus, which at the time was spreading from Wuhan, China, to nations like the United States, Italy, Iran, and South Korea.”

“The report is based on the meeting’s official records.”

Commentary and Opinion from Trending Politics:

What Gates failed to mention is how the World Health Organization’s actions led to the deaths of thousands and thousands of people.

China knew early on how contageous the coronavirus was yet did nothing. On January 14th, instead of pressing China on the truth about the virus, the WHO tweeted that there was no human to human transmission of the virus.

Medical experts were intent on implementing travel bans however they were talked out of it by WHO bureaucrats during a meeting in Geneva, Switzerland. The bans would have most likely saved thousands of lives.

Check out what Sky News digital editor Jack Houghton had to say:

[WHO] actually decided not to go ahead with [travel ban recommendations] and not declare a global health emergency but there were a few dissenting voices. So the official meeting records say there was a divergence of views but they won’t actually go into detail about who was trying to block it. But there were doctors there who wanted to issue travel bans and the World Health Organization blocked it.